Pitts v. State, 52 S.E. 147 (Ga. 1905). · Go Syfert
Search
Pitts v. State, 52 S.E. 147 (Ga. 1905). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Edmonds v. State (gactapp, 1990-05-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1908 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1908 1967 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Edmonds v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1990 · confidence medium
J., and Sognier, J., concur. 1 “There are two general kinds of challenges to a jury panel: (1) Challenge to the array and (2) challenge to the poll. [See Bryan v. State, 124 Ga. 79, 80 ( 52 SE 298 ).] Challenges to the array go to the form and manner of making up the entire panel without regard to objection to the individual jurors.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Huff v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1932 · confidence medium
The gist of the first question to be determined is whether the trial judge erred in overruling the defendant’s written challenge to the array, based on the ground that the sheriff, who was the prosecutor in the ease, “summoned four talesmen . . to fill the panel originally drawn for said August term, said sheriff knowing that said case would stand for trial at said term.” In order that the position of counsel for the plaintiff in error may be better understood, we quote as follows from h'is brief: “The gravamen of this exception is that the jury was improperly and illegally empanelled,…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Campbell v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1919 · confidence medium
Schnell v. State, 92 Ga. 459 ( 17 S. E. 966 ); Bryan v. State, 124 Ga. 79, 80 ( 52 S. E. 298 ), and cases cited; Coleman v. State, 141 Ga. 731, 732 ( 82 S. E. 228 ), and cases cited; Throckmorton v. State, 23 Ga. App. 112 ( 97 S. E. 664 ).
cited Cited "see" Morgan v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Bryan v. State, 124 Ga. 79 ( 52 SE 298 ) (1905).
cited Cited "see" Bullard v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1914 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bryan v. State, 124 Ga. 79 ( 52 S. E. 298 ); Jacobs v. State, 1 Ga. App. 519 ( 57 S. E. 1062 ); McKay v. State, 6 Ga. App. 527 ( 65 S. E. 306 ).
Pitts
v.
State
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 9, 1905.
52 S.E. 147
Greene F. Johnson, for plaintiff in error., J. E. Pottle, solicitor-general, and 8. T. Wingfield, contra.
Fish.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
-Fish, C. J.

1. Where an indictment charged the accused with the offense of selling whisky without a license, in a given county, upon a named date, the State was not confined to proof of the commission of the offense upon the date named, but had the right to prove its commission, in such county, upon any day within two years prior to the finding of the indictment. Green v. State, 115 Ga. 254.

12. There was no error in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.