Eady v. State, 200 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Eady v. State, 200 S.E.2d 767 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Potts v. State (gactapp, 2009-02-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Potts v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martin v. State, *243 268 Ga. 682, 683 (2) ( 492 SE2d 225 ) (1997). 7 Kuykendoll v. State, 278 Ga. App. at 370-371 (2). 8 See Eady v. State, 129 Ga. App. 656 (1) ( 200 SE2d 767 ) (1973) (no error in denying continuance “based upon the absence of a material witness for whom a subpoena was not issued by defendant until the morning the trial was to begin and who had not been served therewith at the time the motion was made”). 9 (Punctuation omitted.) Davenport v. State, 283 Ga. 171, 173 (4) ( 656 SE2d 844 ) (2008). 10 Salahuddin v. State, 277 Ga. 561, 564 (3) ( 592 SE2d 410 ) (2004). 11 S…
cited Cited "see" Shaw v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Eady v. State, 129 Ga. App. 656 (1) ( 200 SE2d 767 ) (1973).
Eady
v.
the State
48476.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Sep 17, 1973.
200 S.E.2d 767
Beck, Goddard, Owen & Murray, Howard P. Wallace, for appellant., Ben J. Miller, District Attorney, for appellee.
Stolz, Eberhardt, Pannell.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
Stolz, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of the offense of aggravated assault. Held:

1. The trial judge did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion for continuance based upon the absence of a material witness for whom a subpoena was not issued by the defendant until the morning the trial was to begin and who had not been served therewith at the time the motion was made. See Code Ann. § 81-1410 (Ga. L. 1959, p. 342); Code § 27-2002; Code Ann. § 38-801 (a, c, e, f) (Ga. L. 1966, p. 502; 1968, pp. 434, 435; 1968, p. 1200).

2. There was no error in allowing a witness for the state, a detective major of the Griffin Police Department, to remain in the courtroom to assist in the prosecution of the case after testifying. Fountain v. State, 228 Ga. 306 (3) (185 SE2d 62) and cits.

3. Enumerated errors 7 and 8 are without merit.

4. The trial judge did not err in overruling the defendant’s amended motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur. [*657] Beck, Goddard, Owen & Murray, Howard P. Wallace, for appellant. Ben J. Miller, District Attorney, for appellee.