Troop v. Marshall, 77 S.E. 577 (Ga. 1913). · Go Syfert
Search
Troop v. Marshall, 77 S.E. 577 (Ga. 1913). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Suber v. Fountain (gactapp, 1979-09-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1915 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1915 1970 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Suber v. Fountain
Ga. Ct. App. · 1979 · confidence medium
Morgan v. Coleman, 139 Ga. 459, 460 ( 77 SE 579 ); Paulk v. Speer, 143 Ga. 621 (1) (85 SE 867); Franklin v. Towe, 233 Ga. 950 (2) ( 213 SE2d 892 ).
cited Cited "see" American Trust & Banking Co. v. Shaw
Ga. Ct. App. · 1925 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shaw v. Probasco, 139 Ga. 481 ( 77 S. E. 577 ), and Probasco v. Shaw, 144 Ga. 416 ( 87 S. E. 466 ).
Troop
v.
Marshall
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Feb 13, 1913.
77 S.E. 577
John BourJce Jr., for plaintiff in error. W. B. Hewlett, contra.
Evans.
Published
Evans, P. J.

1. In a suit upon a contract made by the parties themselves, though some minor preliminary negotiations may have been conducted by an agent of one of the parties, it is not erroneous to omit an instruction relative to the acts of the agent as affecting the contract.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.