green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Parham v. Heath
Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Rylee, 139 Ga. 669, 674 ( 78 S. E. 27 ). 4.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dumas v. Tyus
Gatewood v. City Bank of Macon, 49 Ga. 45 ; Swift v. Lucas, 92 Ga. 796 ( 19 S. E. 758 ) ; Parker v. Barnesville Savings Bank, 107 Ga. 650 (34 S. B. 365); Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Rylee, 139 Ga. 669, 675 ( 78 S. E. 27 ); Shumate v. McLendon, 120 Ga. 396, 401 ( 48 S. E. 10 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooper v. Dannenberg Co.
See also Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Rylee, 139 Ga. 669 ( 78 S. E. 27 ); Harris v. Luxury Fruit Co., 142 Ga. 61 ( 82 S. E. 447 ).
Hanes
v.
Davis
v.
Davis
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Apr 16, 1913.
William M. Johnson, for plaintiffs in error., Howard Thompson and B. P. Oaillard Jr., contra.
Fish.
Published
Fish, C. J.
1. According to the ruling made in Coleman v. Board of Education, 131 Ga. 644 (5), 648 (63 S. E. 41), a court of equity had jurisdiction to grant the relief sought in the present case.
2. The evidence being conflicting, the judge did not abuse his discretion m granting an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.