Teal v. State, 149 S.E. 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929). · Go Syfert
Search
Teal v. State, 149 S.E. 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bridges v. State (gactapp, 1962-06-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bridges v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1962 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pierce v. State, 40 Ga. App. 227 ( 149 SE 160 ).
Teal
v.
State
19828.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jul 31, 1929.
149 S.E. 160
G. B. McGarity, for plaintiff in error., S. W. Ragsdale, solicitor-general, contra.
Bloodworth.
Published
Bloodworth, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, which is approved by the trial judge, and the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., eonour.