Hunt v. Carter, 404 S.E.2d 121 (Ga. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Hunt v. Carter, 404 S.E.2d 121 (Ga. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Petry v. Romo (gactapp, 2001-04-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Petry v. Romo
Ga. Ct. App. · 2001 · confidence medium
Hunt v. Carter, 261 Ga. 259, 260 (2) ( 404 SE2d 121 ) (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Davis v. Welch
Ga. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hunt v. Carter, 261 Ga. 259 ( 404 SE2d 121 ); Byrd v. Ault, 260 Ga. 893 ( 401 SE2d 690 ).
HUNT
v.
CARTER
S91A0678.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
May 15, 1991.
404 S.E.2d 121
Lennard, Habibi & Rychlik, David M. Rychlik, Charles S. Hunter, for appellant., Duffy & Feemster, Robert J. Duffy, Dwight T. Feemster, T. Michael Martin, for appellee.
Weltner.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Weltner, Justice.

We granted this discretionary application to address the following:

Does a judgment awarding joint legal custody of a child pursuant to OCGA § 19-9-6 preclude a monetary award of child support?

1. OCGA § 19-7-2 describes the statutory duty of both parents to support their child.[1]

[*260] Decided May 15, 1991. Lennard, Habibi & Rychlik, David M. Rychlik, Charles S. Hunter, for appellant. Duffy & Feemster, Robert J. Duffy, Dwight T. Feemster, T. Michael Martin, for appellee.

2. OCGA § 19-9-5 provides expressly that “the term ‘custody’ shall not include payment of child support.” [2]

Hence, a parent may be required to support a child, notwithstanding the existence of “joint legal custody,” as defined in OCGA § 19-9-6.[3]

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

All the Justices concur.
1

It is the joint and several duty of each parent to provide for the maintenance, protection, and education of his child until the child reaches the age of majority, except to the extent that the duty of one parent is otherwise or further defined by court order.

Note: OCGA § 19-6-15, the Uniform Child Support Guidelines, provides that child support shall be determined under the guidelines, but may be adjusted up or down based upon “a written finding of special circumstances.”

The special circumstances may be any factor which the trier of fact deems to be required by the ends of justice. Some of the factors which may warrant such varia[*260] tions include, but are not limited to . . . (5) Shared physical custody arrangements, including extended visitation. [OCGA § 19-6-15 (c).]

See also Walker v. Walker, 260 Ga. 442 (396 SE2d 235) (1990) (guidelines create no new duty).

2

(a) In all proceedings under this article between parents it shall be expressly permissible for the parents of a minor child to present to the court an agreement respecting any and all issues concerning custody of the minor child. As used in this Code section, the term “custody” shall not include payment of child support.

3

(2) “Joint legal custody” means both parents have equal rights and responsibilities for major decisions concerning the child, including the child’s education, health care, and religious training; provided, however, that the court may designate one parent to have sole power to make certain decisions while both parents retain equal rights and responsibilities for other decisions.