green
Positive treatment
18.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
McLAUGHLIN v. PAYNE
This includes the investigatory stages of matters preparatory to the seeking of an indictment as well as the pendency of the case. [Cit.]” King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 389 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Morgan v. Propst
Gillis, supra (citing King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Moseley v. Sentence Review Panel
(2×)
King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 389 (7), 271 S.E.2d 630 (1980).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Johnson v. State
See OCGA§ 16-2-20 (b) (a person is involved in a crime’s commission if, among other things, she intentionally aids, abets, advises, encourages, hires, counsels, or procures another to commit the crime). 4 See OCGA§ 24-9-20 (b). 5 While the trial judge denied appellant’s motion in limine, he also noted that appellant was free to raise objections to purported character evidence during the course of trial. 6 OCGA § 17-8-57. 7 Id. 8 Miller v. State, 243 Ga. App. 764 ( 533 SE2d 787 ) (2000). 9 See Milhouse v. State, 254 Ga. 357, 359 ( 329 SE2d 490 ) (1985) (contentions that a trial judge’s…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bitt International Co. v. Fletcher
(Punctuation omitted.) King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980); Baptiste v. State, supra at 694.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wise v. State
Cf. OCGA § 15-1-8 (a) (3) (“No judge ... of any court. . . shall. . . [s]it in any case or proceeding in which he has been of counsel [before his appointment as judge] . . . without the consent of all parties in interest.”); King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 389 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980) (citing Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct) (“A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where ... he served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy.”) (citations and punctuation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gillis v. City of Waycross
(2×)
"The fact that his impartiality `might reasonably be questioned' suffices for his disqualification." King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7), 271 S.E.2d 630 (1980); see also Sears v. State, 262 Ga. 805 (1)(a), 426 S.E.2d 553 (1993).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Christensen v. State
(2×)
State v. Fleming, supra at 702 (1); see also Wellons v. State, supra at 88 (18); Birt v. State, supra at 486 (4); King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980); Baptiste v. State, supra at 694 (1).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Matter of Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 97-61
See Birt v. State, 256 Ga. 483, 485 (4) ( 350 SE2d 241 ) (1986); King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Baptiste v. State
King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Prater v. State
King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 389 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980); compare Wood v. Clarke, 188 Ga. 697, 698-699 ( 4 SE2d 659 ) (1939).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Agan
A similar contention was rejected in King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 387-388 ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980), as follows: Bribery is a well-known word, used widely and understood generally.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rozier v. State
In King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 387 (2) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980), this Court held: A fundamental requirement of a criminal statute is that it gives “fair warning” of what conduct is criminal.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Agan v. State
(2×)
King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 387-388 (2) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980)s. 3.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Patterson v. Butler
The fact that his impartiality “might reasonably be questioned” suffices for his disqualification.’ King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980).” Birt v. State, 256 Ga. 483, 486 , supra. Accord Isaacs v. State, 257 Ga. 126 ( 355 SE2d 644 ) (1987).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Isaacs v. State
Birt v. State, 256 Ga. 483 (4) ( 350 SE2d 241 ) (1986); King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Birt v. State
The fact that his impartiality ‘might reasonably be questioned’ suffices for his disqualification.” King v. State, 246 Ga. 386, 390 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Cardinale v. City of Atlanta
See King v. State, 246 Ga. 386 (7) ( 271 SE2d 630 ) (1980) (judicial recusal statute); CGU Ins.
HARRIS
v.
FORD
v.
FORD
36547.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sep 23, 1980.
Melvin Robinson, for appellant., Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, W. Davis Hewitt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Published
Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59.
All the Justices concur.