green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Daniel J. Koenig
Third Circuit: United States v. Wheeler, 3 Cir., 1958, 256 F.2d 745 , certiorari denied 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct.111, 3 L.Ed.2d 103 (after indictment, order appealable); United States v. Pack, 3 Cir., 1957, 247 F.2d 168 (after indictment and dismissal, order not appeal-able) ; United States v. Bianco, 3 Cir., 1951, 189 F.2d 716 (before indictment, order appealable); United States v. Janitz, 3 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 19 (after indictment, order not appealable); Re Sana Laboratories, Inc., 3 Cir., 1940, 115 F.2d 717 , certiorari denied sub. nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
See United States v. Wheeler, 256 F.2d 745, 747 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct. 111 , 3 L.Ed.2d 103 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hayman Cash Register Co. v. Sarokin
See United States v. Wheeler, 256 F.2d 745, 747 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct. 111 , 3 L.Ed.2d 103 (1958) (stressing that “if the first judge is available the matter should again be presented to him”). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Herring v. Moore
See, United States v. Wheeler, 256 F.2d 745 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct. 111 , 3 L.Ed.2d 103 , rehearing denied, 358 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 229 , 3 L.Ed.2d 234 (1958), and Carnegie Nat.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington
See, United States v. Wheeler, 256 F.2d 745 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct. 111 , 3 L.Ed.2d 103 , rehearing denied, 358 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 229 , 3 L.Ed.2d 234 (1958), and Carnegie Nat.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Carmona
See, United States v. Wheeler, 256 F.2d 745 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873 , 79 S.Ct. 111 , 3 L.Ed.2d 103 , rehearing denied, 358 U.S. 913 , 79 S.Ct. 229 , 3 L.Ed.2d 234 (1958), and Carnegie Nat.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antonio Santasucci v. Hugh Gallen
See also County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co., 360 U.S. 185, 189 , 79 S.Ct. 113 , 3 L.Ed.2d 103 (1959); Field, Abstention in Constitutional Cases: The Scope of the Pullman Abstention Doctrine, 122 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1071 (1974). *529 Here, appellants' claim turns entirely on the interpretation of state law.
County of Allegheny
v.
Frank Mashuda Co.
v.
Frank Mashuda Co.
No. 347.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 27, 1958.
Maurice Louik for petitioner. Don Rose for respondents.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.