green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Spearman v. State
See 41 Ga., 613 ; 28 Mo. App., 97 ; 13 Mo. App., 591 ; 14 Mo. App., 418 ; 13 Mo. App., 588 ; 170 Penn.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. State
See also, 41 Ga., 613 ; 46 Id., 626 ; 54 Id., 625 ; 58 Id., 87; 60 Id., 509; 61 Id., 305; 63 Id., 410.
THOMAS CASTELLO, in error
v.
SOPHRONIA CASTELLO, in error
v.
SOPHRONIA CASTELLO, in error
Moses & Downing; C. R. Russell, for plaintiff in error., No appearance for defendant.
Warner.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
*WARNER, J.
The husband was a competent witness, on the trial of the case, under the provisions of the 3798th section of the Code, but could not testify as to any facts derived by him from the confidential relation of husband and wife.
Eet the judgment of the Court below be reversed.