Kenneth R. Lalonde v. United States of Am., 478 F.2d 700 (8th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Kenneth R. Lalonde v. United States of Am., 478 F.2d 700 (8th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission (ca5, 1984-10-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Johnson Act is applicable only when "[j]urisdiction is based solely on diversity of citizenship or repugnance of the [state action] to the Federal Constitution.” Id. § 1342 (1); see also DeKalb County v. Southern Bell Tel & Tel Co., 358 F.Supp. 498, 504 (N.D.Ga.1972) (all four preconditions must be present before Johnson Act is applicable), aff’d, 478 F.2d 700 (5th Cir.1973).
Kenneth R. LaLONDE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
72-1699.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jun 21, 1973.
478 F.2d 700
Robert J. Milzavetz, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff-appellant., William A. Whitledge, Atty., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees.
Bright, Clark, Heaney, Per Curiam.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion. LaLonde v. United States, 350 F.Supp. 976 (D.Minn. 1972).