Ederheimer, Stein & Co. v. Carson, 75 S.E. 828 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912). · Go Syfert
Search
Ederheimer, Stein & Co. v. Carson, 75 S.E. 828 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Neely v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co. (gactapp, 1935-11-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" Neely v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1935 · signal: see · confidence high
See Southern Tobacco Co. v. Armstrong, 11 Ga. App. 501 (4) (75 S. E. 828 ); Stovall v. McBrayer, 20 Ga. App. 93 ( 92 S. E. 543 ); Equitable Bldg. & Loan Association v. Brady, 171 Ga. 576, 584 ( 156 S. E. 222 ).
Ederheimer, Stein & Co.
v.
Carson
3683.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Sep 24, 1912.
75 S.E. 828
J. B. Murrow, J. J. Murray, for plaintiffs., Fulwood & Sheen, B. D. Smith, for defendant.
Russell.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Russell, J.

1. This ease is controlled in principle by the decision of this court in Haber-Blum-Bloch Hat Co. v. Friesleben, 5 Ga. App. 123 (62 S. E. 712). The defendant having invoked and obtained from the referee a ruling that the plaintiff’s claim was not provable in bankruptcy, (and the plaintiff having acquiesced in such ruling to its prejudice, the defendant is now estopped from assuming an inconsistent position, and from asserting that the plaintiff can not recover on account of the defendant’s discharge in bankruptcy.

2. As to the plaintiff’s right to recover, the decision is controlled by the ruling of this court in Ederheimer, Stein & Co. v. Carson, 7 Ga. App. 304 (66 S. E. 814). Judgment reversed.