green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Golf, Ltd. Partnership v. Maryland Economic Development Corp.
See State v. Good Samaritan Hospital, Inc., 299 Md. 310, 321-322 , 473 A.2d 892, 898 , appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 802 , 105 S.Ct. 56 , 83 L.Ed.2d 7 (1984) (“ § 48 of Article III of the Constitution of Maryland explicitly provides that corporate charters are ‘subject to repeal or modification [and] may be altered, from time to time, or be repealed.’ * * * These constitutional and statutory provisions are plain manifestations of the well-settled principle that a corporation holds its charter subject to the constitutional exercise of the State’s ... power to legislate in the public inter…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wheeler v. Nieves
See also In re Coruzzi, 95 N.J. 557, 571 , 472 A.2d 546 (1984) (conviction of judge conclusively established his guilt in subsequent disciplinary proceedings), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 802 , 105 S.Ct. 56 , 83 L.Ed.2d 8 (1984); Figueroa v. Hartford Insurance Co., 241 N.J.Super. 578, 583 , 575 A.2d 888 (App.Div.1990) (convicted person could be collaterally estopped from relitigating issue of intent to commit crime after issue was settled in previous criminal action); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Schmitt, 238 N.J.Super. 619, 622 , 570 A.2d 488 (App.Div.) (a judgment of conviction is conclusive evi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
East Prince Frederick Corp v. Board of County Commissioners
See also State v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 299 Md. 310, 321-322 , 473 A.2d 892, 897-898 (corporate charter is a contract, but it is not impaired by exercise of police power regulating industry of which corporation is a part), dismissed, 469 U.S. 802 , 105 S.Ct. 56 , 83 L.Ed.2d 7 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joan Doe v. The City Of Butler
See also Macon Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. Macon-Bibb, 252 Ga. 484 , 314 S.E.2d 218 (ordinance that limited dwelling units to those occupied by a single family or four unrelated persons survived equal protection challenge), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 802 , 105 S.Ct. 57 , 83 L.Ed.2d 8 (1984). 20 Appellants stress that the Washington Street house was situated in an R-2 medium density district.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. City of Butler
See also Macon Ass’n for Retarded Citizens v. Macon-Bibb, 252 Ga. 484 , 314 S.E.2d 218 (ordinance that limited dwelling units to those occupied by a single family or four unrelated persons survived equal protection challenge), appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 802 , 105 S.Ct. 57 , 83 L.Ed.2d 8 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Wire, Metal & MacHine Health & Welfare Fund v. State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund
See also State v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 299 Md. 310, 327-28 , 473 A.2d 892, 900-01 , appeal dismissed, 469 U.S. 802 , 105 S.Ct. 56 , 83 L.Ed.2d 7 (1984).
Good Samaritan Hospital of Maryland, Inc.
v.
Maryland
v.
Maryland
No. 84-43.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Md. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.