Haggerty v. Holmes & Barber, 93 S.E. 559 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917). · Go Syfert
Search
Haggerty v. Holmes & Barber, 93 S.E. 559 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. Keane (gactapp, 1971-09-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. Keane
Ga. Ct. App. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baker Mercantile Co. v. Hancock Bros. & Co., 20 Ga. App. 799 (2) ( 93 SE 496 ); Wilson v. Bank of Louisiana, 55 Ga. 98 .
discussed Cited "see" Aderhold v. Zimmer (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1952 · signal: see · confidence high
See, in this connection, Mills v. Pope, 20 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 93 S. E. 559 ); Alexander v. State, 32 Ga. App. 488 (3) ( 123 S. E. 923 ). 3.
cited Cited "see" Scarboro v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1919 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mills v. Pope, 20 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 93 S. E. 559 ); Amerson v. State, 18 Ga. App. 177 (6) ( 88 S. E. 998 ).
Haggerty
v.
Holmes & Barber
8687.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Sep 13, 1917.
93 S.E. 559
Greene F. Johnson, James M. Johnson, for plaintiff., E. K. Wilcox, Whitaker & Dukes, for defendants.
Eobge.
Published
G-eobge, J.

An examination of the record discloses no substantial error upon any controlling issue in the case. This being the second verdict in favor of the defendant, and there being evidence to sustain the verdict, the judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for new trial will not be reversed.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.