green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
S.F. v. State
See J.W.J. v. State, 994 So.2d 1223, 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); M.D.J. v. State, 936 So.2d 774, 775 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); T.L.S., 949 So.2d at 292-93 .
M.D.J., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
5D05-3330.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 1, 2006.
Per Curiam.
Published
[*775] James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We strike the assessment of the fine set forth in section 939.185, Florida Statutes (2005), as it has no application in juvenile proceedings. See V.K.E. v. State, 934 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). We affirm the trial court's order denying suppression of M.D.J.'s statement to law enforcement as we agree that M.D.J. was not the subject of a custodial interrogation.
AFFIRMED; FINE STRICKEN.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.