green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. State
See Goldsmith v. State, 99 Ga. 253 . (б) Upon the trial of one charged with the offense of carrying concealed weapons, when the evidence discloses that the pistol was carried in the manner above designated, it was not erroneous for the court to refuse, upon request, to charge: “If you believe that the defendant was carrying the said pistol for the purpose of transportation alone, you are authorized to find him not guilty.” 2.
GOLDSMITH
v.
State
v.
State
E. A. Angier, A. G. Perry and M. Macks, for plaintiff in error. J. F. O’Neill, solicitor, contra.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Lumpkin, J.
1. One who transports a pistol from a .shop where it has been repaired, although he does so at the request of the owner and for the sole purpose of delivering it to the latter, is guilty of the offense of carrying a concealed weapon, if, in the act of transporting the pistol, he carries it concealed upon his person. Penal Code, §341, and cases cited.
2. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial were meritorious, and the conviction of the accused was manifestly right
Judgment affirmed.