Beck v. State, 801 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Beck v. State, 801 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Adams v. State (fladistctapp, 2016-06-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Adams v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
“When summarily denying a motion for return of property pursuant to the sixty-day time bar, the trial court must attach those portions of the record showing that the property was seized pursuant to a lawful investigation or held as evidence.” Burden v. State, 890 So.2d 566, 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (citing Cloud v. State, 801 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), and McKinnon v. State, 752 So.2d 134, 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)); accord White v. State, 926 So.2d 473, 474 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
discussed Cited "see" Davis v. State (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cloud, 801 So.2d at 964 .
cited Cited "see" Stevens v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cloud v. State, 801 So.2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Hughes v. State, 768 So.2d 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
discussed Cited "see" White v. State (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cloud, 801 So.2d at 964 .
cited Cited "see" Wilson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cloud v. State, 801 So.2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Hughes v. State, 768 So.2d 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
discussed Cited "see" Burden v. State (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cloud v. State, 801 So.2d 964, 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); McKinnon v. State, 752 So.2d 134, 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
discussed Cited "see" Garnto v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beck v. State, 801 So.2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that, since the trial court properly did not review the additional allegations contained in the memoranda accompanying a rule 3.850 motion, the trial court would be affirmed without prejudice to the timely refiling of the motion and memoranda).
Carl C. BECK, Sr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
2D01-3920.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 16, 2001.
801 So. 2d 964
Whatley.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

WHATLEY, Judge.

Carl Beck, Sr., appeals the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Beck filed a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion, but in support of the motion, he filed two memoranda that amplified the claims in the motion and also added new claims of ineffectiveness of counsel, such as[*965] counsel's failure to investigate self-defense as a defense. The memoranda were unsworn, and the trial court properly refused to consider them. See Brown v. State, 620 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). We affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to Beck to refile the motion and the memoranda with the proper oaths included. See Pavey v. State, 720 So.2d 563 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Brown, 620 So.2d 1076. Beck shall have thirty days from the date of the issuance of the mandate following this opinion to file the motion and the corrected memoranda. See Pavey, 720 So.2d 563.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., Concur.