Reitzel v. Sch. Bd. of Monroe Cnty., 212 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Reitzel v. Sch. Bd. of Monroe Cnty., 212 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: FREDERIC GUTTENBERG v. SMITH & WESSON, CORP. (fladistctapp, 2023-01-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) FREDERIC GUTTENBERG v. SMITH & WESSON, CORP. (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
The court’s ruling is accorded great deference, and appellants have the burden of showing clear error for reversal.”); Fla. Carry, Inc. v. City of Tallahassee, 212 So. 3d 452, 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“When a trial court dismisses a count in a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment or declines to address the claim, the trial court’s ruling is accorded great deference.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. Florida State Board of Education
Fla. · 2019 · confidence medium
See Ison v. Zimmerman, 372 So. 2d 431, 434 (Fla. 1979); Fla. Carry, Inc. v. City of Tallahassee, 212 So. 3d 452, 460 (Fla. lst DCA 2017).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. Florida State Board of Education
Fla. · 2019 · confidence medium
See Ison v. Zimmerman, 372 So. 2d 431, 434 (Fla. 1979); Fla. Carry, Inc. v. City of Tallahassee, 212 So. 3d 452, 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Florida Carry, Inc., and Rebekah Hargrove v. John E. Thrasher, an individual
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
UF, 180 So. 3d at 150-51 . 3 In Florida Carry, Inc. v. City of Tallahassee, 212 So. 3d 452, 461-62 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we determined that in order for a local ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation to violate section 790.33(a), Florida Statutes, the local ordinance, administrative rule, or regulations had to be enacted or enforced.
Katherine REITZEL
v.
The SCHOOL BOARD OF MONROE COUNTY, Florida
No. 3D15-2545.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 11, 2017.
212 So. 3d 452
The Powell Law Firm, P.A. and Brett C. Powell, for appellant., Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., and Michael T. Burke and Hudson C. Gill (Fort Lauder-dale), for appellee.
Lagoa, Salter, Suarez.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Katherine Reitzel (“Reitzel”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, the School Board of Monroe County, Florida (“School Board”). Because genuine issues of material fact exist, we reverse and remand.

Summary judgement is improper unless the record demonstrates that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Here, genuine material issues of fact remain as to whether Reitzel voluntarily decided to retire and whether the School Board had good cause for Reit-zel’s termination. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the School Board and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.