green
Positive treatment
11.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State of Florida v. Young
Cf. Carlson v. State, 227 So. 3d 1261, 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ("We typically view the Legislature's use of varied language in the same statute as a sign the Legislature intended varied things."); Hinzman v. Winter Haven Facility Operations LLC, 109 So. 3d 256, 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ("[B]ecause the Legislature specified 'business days' elsewhere in section 440.13, canons of statutory interpretation (particularly the presumption of consistent usage) dictate that the Legislature's use of the unmodified term 'days' here refers to consecutive or calendar days.").
cited
Cited "see"
Milovan Zekanovic v. American II, Corp./ Gallagher-Bassett etc.
See Hinzman v. Winter Haven Facility Operations LLC, 109 So.3d 256, 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
cited
Cited "see"
Gadol v. Masoret Yehudit, Inc.
See Hinzman v. Winter Haven Facility Operations LLC, 109 So.3d 256, 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
Elma ROLAND
v.
David ROLAND, an alleged incapacitated person
v.
David ROLAND, an alleged incapacitated person
No. 4D12-474.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 13, 2013.
Steven K. Schwartz of Steven K. Schwartz, P.A., Aventura, and Ronald J. Isriel of Isriel, Ponzoli, Keller & Simpson, P.A., Miami, for appellant., Scott A. Weiss of Selzer & Weiss, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Ciklin, David, Morgan, Stevenson.
Published
Affirmed. See Rothman v. Rothman, 93 So.3d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).