green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Fernandez
By petition for certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District (Fernandez v. State, 255 So.2d 567, 568-570 (Fla.App.) which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court (Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.); State v. Smith, 240 So.2d 807 ), as well as with prior decisions of the District Court of Appeal, First District (Alderman v. State, 167 So.2d 635 (Fla.App.); McPhee v. State, 254 So.2d 406 , (Fla.App.) ) on the same point of law.
George William MADDEN
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. P-13.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 21, 1971.
255 So. 2d 567
E. Wilson Crump, II, of Moore & Crump, Niceville, for appellant., Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Carroll, Donald, Rawls, Wigginton.
Published
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.