Herise v. Tatum, Gomez, Smith & Vitale Constr., Inc., 509 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Herise v. Tatum, Gomez, Smith & Vitale Constr., Inc., 509 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 7627292.
John HERISE
v.
TATUM, GOMEZ, SMITH and VITALE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation
No. 86-1684.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 14, 1987.
509 So. 2d 988
Abramson & Magidson and John Abram-son, Miami, for appellant., Preddy, Kutner, Hardy, Rubinoff, Brown & Thompson and G. William Bissett, Miami, for appellee.
Barkdull, Baskin, Hendry.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Ford Motor Company v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); United Technologies Communications Company v. Industrial Risk Insurers, 501 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company v. Hampton Shops, Inc., 332 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Wallace v. Rashkow, 270 So.2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Section 59.041 Florida Statutes (1985).