Bakerman v. Dep't Of Bus. Reg., 649 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Bakerman v. Dep't Of Bus. Reg., 649 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert BAKERMAN
v.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
No. 93-1142.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 11, 1995.
649 So. 2d 275
Rodger J. Bakerman, for appellant., Richard A. Grumberg, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
Cope, Gersten, Goderich.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Robert Bakerman appeals an order of the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.

Assuming, without deciding, that appellant was entitled to an administrative appeal as a matter of right to the Division of Pari-Mutu-el Wagering, we find no reversible evidentia-ry error and conclude that the law was correctly applied. See Fla.Admin.Code R. 61D-1.008(16); Hyman v. State, Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 431 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); § 550.2415, Fla.Stat. (1993).

Affirmed.