No syfertize treatment data for cluster 4259901.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Damarick MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Richard Damarick MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant
15-15191.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 26, 2016.
658 F. App'x 526
Cherie Krigsman, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, TAMPA, FL, Roger Bernard Handberg, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, ORLANDO, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Larry B. Henderson, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, ORLANDO, FL, Richard Da-marick Mitchell, MARIANNA, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Wilson, Rosenbaum, Black.
Unpublished | NEW
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Richard Mitchell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.