Leading cases: § 210.05, Fla. Stat.

Cited in 5 cases (0 in the last 5 years, 1979–1997). ← Read the statute text

Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco (1986) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “The primary enabling statute for the rule is § 210.05(5), Fla.Stat. The provisions of the proposed rule are reasonable interpretations of the statutory language and are consistent with the legislative purpose.”

Eli Witt Co. v. State Department of Revenue (In Re Eli Witt Co.) (1979) flmb “Pursuant to § 210.05 Fla.Stat., Eli Witt as a stamping agent appointed by the Department receives a discount on the tax stamps it buys, plus it is allowed to purchase them on credit.”

In Re Eli Witt Co. (1997) flmb “AIG contends that there is a distinction between the collection of the tax and the actual transaction giving rise to the tax.”

Seminole Tribe v. State (1985) fladivadminhrg · cites it 6× “Because the Director, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco (Rasmussen), in discussions with the Secretary of the Department of Business Regulation and the General Counsel thereof, concluded confusion exists regarding the current interpretation of the words “Seminole…”

Eli Witt Co. v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco (1980) fladistctapp “25, Florida Administrative Code for 1976, interpreting § 210.05(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1975). The rule resulted in the allowance of a 2.”