O.C.G.A. § 44-9-4 — Leading Cases | Syfert Law

Leading cases: O.C.G.A. § 44-9-4

Cited in 28 cases (2 in the last 5 years, 1986–2022). ← Read the statute text
Postnieks v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc. (2007) gactapp · cites it 12× “OCGA § 44-9-4 provides that "[a] parol license to use another's land is revocable at any time if its revocation does no harm to the person to whom it has been granted.”
Decker Car Wash, Inc. v. BP Products North America, Inc. (2007) gactapp · cites it 16× “Decker appeals, contending that, pursuant to OCGA § 44-9-4, a parol license to use BP’s property had ripened into an easement running with the land in favor of Decker’s property.”
Mize v. McGarity (2008) gactapp · cites it 8× “Following a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of the petitioners, granting them the easements they sought pursuant to OCGA § 44-9-4 and awarding them $12,000 in attorney fees.”
Waters v. Ellzey (2008) gactapp · cites it 8× “A07A2155 appeals that portion of the trial court’s judgment which adopted a special master’s report and awarded dock easement rights to John and Donna Waters (collectively “the Waters”) on the grounds of estoppel and OCGA § 44-9-4. In Case No. A07A1920, the Waters appeal that…”
Aquanaut Diving & Engineering, Inc. v. Guitar Center Stores, Inc. (2013) gactapp · cites it 12× “Diving World contends the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to Guitar Center Stores and by failing to grant Diving World’s motion for summary judgment because a license for the sign was created either in writing or under OCGA § 44-9-4. Diving World also argues that…”
Camp Cherokee, Inc. v. Marina Lane, LLC (2012) gactapp · cites it 4× “That statute pertinently provides that “[a] parol license is not revocable when the licensee has acted pursuant thereto and in so doing has incurred expense; in such case, it becomes an easement running with the land.”
Hopkins v. Virginia Highland Associates, L.P. (2000) gactapp · cites it 4× “The trial court found that the letter constituted a license that “thereafter became irrevocable due to subsequent expenditure” under OCGA § 44-9-4. Alternatively, according to the trial court’s order, Meddin obtained a parol license that could be construed as an easement running…”
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. Garrison Ridge Shopping Center Marietta, GA, L.P. (2007) gactapp · cites it 4× “3 OCGA § 44-9-4 provides: A parol license to use another’s land is revocable at any time if its revocation does no harm to the person to whom it has been granted.”
De Castro v. Durrell (2008) gactapp · cites it 2× “24 OCGA § 44-9-4. 25 (Citations and punctuation omitted.”
Warner v. Brown (2008) gactapp · cites it 6× “Alternatively, the Warners claim that they were given a parol license to use the Roadway to access their dock, and that such license has ripened into an easement pursuant to OCGA § 44-9-4. That statute provides: A parol license to use another’s land is revocable at any time if…”
Strozzo v. Coffee Bluff Marina Property (2001) gactapp · cites it 2× “Even if the jury were to find that MRS exceeded that initial permissive scope by erecting the dock and boat hoist, then the question would remain whether MRS ever gave actual notice of an adverse claim and subsequently held possession for 20 years.”
McCorkle v. Morgan (1997) ga · cites it 4× “Relying upon OCGA § 44-9-4, plaintiffs brought a declaratory judgment action, asserting that they were given a parol license to use the southernmost tract for ingress, egress, and parking; that they incurred expenses in the execution of the license; and that, therefore, the…”
Meinhardt v. Christianson (2008) gactapp · cites it 2× “OCGA § 44-9-4 provides that “[a] parol license to use another’s land is revocable at any time if its revocation does no harm to the person to whom it has been granted.”
Parrott v. Fairmont Development, Inc. (2002) gactapp · cites it 2× “8 (b) Parrott also contends that he acquired a right-of-way easement under OCGA § 44-9-4, which governs parol licenses to use another’s land.”
Harper Investments, Inc. v. Department of Transportation (2001) gactapp · cites it 2× “326, 327 ( 219 SE2d 439 ) (1975); see also OCGA § 44-9-4; 1 Pindar’s Ga. Real Estate Law & Procedure (5th ed.”
Blake v. RGL Associates, Inc. (2004) gactapp · cites it 2× “Under OCGA § 44-9-4, “[a] parol license to use another’s land is revocable at any time if its revocation does no harm to the person to whom it has been granted.”
Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc. v. McNeil Real Estate Fund VI, Ltd. (1986) gand “§ 44-9-4. Thus, plaintiff’s claim that it has a right of access through its own easement cannot be accepted.”
Donald Azar, Inc. v. Muche (2014) gactapp · cites it 2× “…that [the defendant] never agreed to a parol license to use the way, the trial court’s order must be affirmed.”). OCGA § 44-9-4.”
Lovell v. Anderson (2000) gactapp · cites it 2× “Pursuant to OCGA § 44-9-4, [a] parol license to use another’s land is revocable at any time if its revocation does no harm to the person to whom it *539 has been granted.”
Aquanaut Diving and Engineering, Inc. D/B/A Diving World v. Guitar Center Stores, Inc. (2013) gactapp · cites it 9× “Diving World contends the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to Guitar Center Stores and by failing to grant Diving World’s motion for summary judgment because a license for the sign was created either in writing or under OCGA § 44-9-4. Diving World also argues that…”