Statute treatment: 104-67 Pub.L. §

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 88 citation events across 78 distinct cases.

88citations total

78distinct interpreting cases

28distinct courts

7citations in last 5y

1996–2025year range

Top 20 leading cases

#1 Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court (1999) cal 231 own cites 4× in case

#2 Marksman Partners, L.P. v. Chantal Pharmaceutical Corp. (1996) cacd 125 own cites 4× in case

#3 Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc. (2003) cal 294 own cites 2× in case

#4 Friedberg v. Discreet Logic Inc. (1997) mad 38 own cites 3× in case

#5 In Re: Comshare, Incorporated Securities Litigation. Harry M. Hoffman v. Comshare, Inc. (1999) ca6 302 own cites 1× in case

#6 Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc. (2016) cal 153 own cites 1× in case

#7 Hawran v. Hixson (2012) calctapp 141 own cites 1× in case

#8 John W. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., A Delaware Corporation (2001) ca3 120 own cites 1× in case

#9 cluster 768509 (2000) ca8 102 own cites 1× in case

#10 Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. v. United International Holdings, Inc. (2001) scotus 98 own cites 1× in case

#11 In Re Silicon Graphics, Inc. Securities Litigation (1997) cand 96 own cites 1× in case

#12 Masters v. Wilhelmina Model Agency, Inc. (2007) ca2 51 own cites 1× in case

#13 Salinger v. Projectavision, Inc. (1997) nysd 42 own cites 1× in case

#14 Weisburgh v. Fidelity Magellan Fund (1999) ca1 41 own cites 1× in case

#15 Fitzer v. Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (2000) mad 41 own cites 1× in case

#16 Sloane Overseas Fund, Ltd. v. Sapiens International Corp. (1996) nysd 41 own cites 1× in case

#17 In Re Raytheon Securities Litigation (2001) mad 41 own cites 1× in case

#18 Crowell v. Ionics, Inc. (2004) mad 38 own cites 1× in case

#19 In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities Litigation (2002) mad 32 own cites 1× in case

#20 In Re SmarTalk Teleservices, Inc. Securities Litigation (2000) ohsd 32 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.