15 U.S.C. § 78t(d) — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 15 U.S.C. § 78t(d)

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 28 citation events across 10 distinct cases.
28citations total
10distinct interpreting cases
7distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
1987–2000year range
Top 9 leading cases
#1 Moskowitz v. Lopp (1989) paed 71 own cites 3× in case
#2 In Re ORFA Securities Litigation (1987) njd 55 own cites 1× in case
#3 Ceres Partners v. Gel Associates (1990) ca2 25 own cites 1× in case
#4 Fry v. UAL Corp. (1995) ilnd 13 own cites 1× in case
#5 Ceres Partners v. GEL Associates (1990) ca2 51 own cites 1× in case
#6 Clay v. Riverwood International Corp. (1998) ca11 2 own cites 12× in case
#7 In Re Engineering Animation Securities Litigation (2000) iasd 5 own cites 1× in case
#8 Clay v. Riverwood International Corp. (1997) gand 4 own cites 1× in case
#9 Liebhard v. Square D Co. (1992) ilnd 1 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.