17 C.F.R. § 32.9 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 17 C.F.R. § 32.9

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 60 citation events across 28 distinct cases.
60citations total
28distinct interpreting cases
17distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
1977–2009year range
Top 20 leading cases
#1 Dunn v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (1997) scotus 134 own cites 4× in case
#2 Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co. (1996) ohsd 26 own cites 6× in case
#3 Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc. (1994) ill 262 own cites 2× in case
#4 Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. John J. Muller (1978) ca5 59 own cites 3× in case
#5 Kelley v. Carr (1977) miwd 45 own cites 2× in case
#6 Kelley v. Carr (1983) miwd 41 own cites 2× in case
#7 Lehman Bros. Commercial v. Minmetals International Non-Ferrous Metals Trading Co. (2000) nysd 25 own cites 2× in case
#8 Myron v. Chicoine (1982) ca7 43 own cites 4× in case
#9 First Commodity Corp. Of Boston and Richard Badoian v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and John Ruddy (1982) ca1 58 own cites 1× in case
#10 Precious Metals Associates, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (1980) ca1 55 own cites 1× in case
#11 Myron v. Martin (1982) ca5 8 own cites 8× in case
#12 Myron v. Hauser (1982) ca8 20 own cites 4× in case
#13 Federal Deposit Insurance v. UMIC, Inc. (1998) ca10 33 own cites 1× in case
#14 Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. U. S. Metals Depository Co. (1979) nysd 31 own cites 1× in case
#15 Berman v. Bache, Halsey, Stuart, Shields, Inc. (1979) ohsd 30 own cites 1× in case
#16 Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Gibraltar Monetary Corp. (2009) ca11 22 own cites 1× in case
#17 Witzel v. Chartered Systems Corp. of NY (1980) mnd 18 own cites 1× in case
#18 Ping He (Hai Nam) Co. v. Nonferrous Metals (U.S.A.) Inc. (1998) nysd 7 own cites 2× in case
#19 Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Sterling Trading Group, Inc. (2009) flsd 4 own cites 3× in case
#20 Tommy M. Parker v. Timothy Ryan and United States Department of Treasury, Office of Thrift Supervision (1992) ca5 14 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.