Statute treatment: 18 U.S.C. § 2701-2712

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 83 citation events across 64 distinct cases.

83citations total

64distinct interpreting cases

37distinct courts

2citations in last 5y

2005–2024year range

Top 20 leading cases

#1 United States v. Quartavious Davis (2015) ca11 133 own cites 3× in case

#2 Vista Marketing, LLC v. Terri A. Burkett (2016) ca11 48 own cites 4× in case

#3 O'GRADY v. Superior Court (2006) calctapp 62 own cites 2× in case

#4 Kenneth A. McCready v. Ebay, Inc., Bruce Kamminga, and David McDuffee (2006) ca7 316 own cites 1× in case

#5 Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. Gaubatz (2011) dcd 55 own cites 2× in case

#6 Commonwealth v. Fulgiam (2017) mass 37 own cites 2× in case

#7 Matthew Alexander v. Verizon Wireless Services, LL (2017) ca5 160 own cites 1× in case

#8 In re the United States (2013) ca5 155 own cites 1× in case

#9 Fayelynn Sams v. Yahoo! Inc. (2013) ca9 94 own cites 1× in case

#10 Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. Gaubatz (2012) dcd 24 own cites 2× in case

#11 Preventive Medicine Associates, Inc. v. Commonwealth (2013) mass 16 own cites 2× in case

#12 Gulley v. State (2012) ark 50 own cites 1× in case

#13 Maria F. Leon Nucci and Henry Leon v. Target Corporation, American Cleaning Contracting, Inc. and First Choice Building Maintenance, Inc. (2015) fladistctapp 15 own cites 2× in case

#14 United States v. Councilman (2005) ca1 96 own cites 2× in case

#15 Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. Gaubatz (2014) dcd 14 own cites 2× in case

#16 Jennings v. Jennings (2010) scctapp 8 own cites 2× in case

#17 Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. Gaubatz (2015) dcd 20 own cites 1× in case

#18 Telecommunications Regulatory Board v. CTIA-The Wireless Ass'n (2014) ca1 19 own cites 1× in case

#19 Long v. Insight Communications of Central Ohio, LLC (2015) ca6 17 own cites 1× in case

#20 Walsh v. Hagee (2012) dcd 16 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.