Statute treatment: 18 U.S.C. § 3663-3664

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 132 citation events across 117 distinct cases.

132citations total

117distinct interpreting cases

24distinct courts

0citations in last 5y

1988–2018year range

Top 20 leading cases

#1 United States v. Helen L. Lively, A/K/A Helen Flugga (1994) ca6 80 own cites 2× in case

#2 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Curtis COMER, Defendant-Appellant (1996) ca6 69 own cites 2× in case

#3 United States v. Stanley Cottman (1998) ca3 66 own cites 2× in case

#4 United States v. Antonakopoulos (2005) ca1 313 own cites 1× in case

#5 United States v. Baggett (1997) ca9 53 own cites 2× in case

#6 United States v. Nichols (1999) ca10 228 own cites 1× in case

#7 United States v. Gilberg (1996) ca1 44 own cites 2× in case

#8 United States v. Willie James Blake, Jr. (1996) ca4 202 own cites 1× in case

#9 United States v. Ernie C. Doyan, Jr. (1990) ca10 40 own cites 2× in case

#10 United States v. Gary M. Stuver, A/K/A Gary M. Stuven (1988) ca4 19 own cites 3× in case

#11 United States v. Phaneuf (1996) ca1 37 own cites 2× in case

#12 United States v. Jerry D. Smith (1991) ca9 141 own cites 1× in case

#13 United States v. Richard Lee Mills (1993) ca9 137 own cites 1× in case

#14 United States v. Bruce Derek Spring AKA Bruce Derek Walls (1996) ca10 135 own cites 1× in case

#15 United States v. Ronald v. Cloud (1989) ca9 131 own cites 1× in case

#16 United States v. Dupre (1997) ca5 124 own cites 1× in case

#17 United States v. Gibbens (1994) ca1 105 own cites 1× in case

#18 United States v. Foley (2007) ca11 104 own cites 1× in case

#19 United States v. Grahame P. Sanders, Cross-Appellee (1996) ca6 98 own cites 1× in case

#20 United States v. Jose Fuentes (1997) ca11 89 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.