19 C.F.R. § 353.20 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 19 C.F.R. § 353.20

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 16 citation events across 12 distinct cases.
16citations total
12distinct interpreting cases
2distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
1987–1998year range
Top 12 leading cases
#1 NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States (1990) cit 55 own cites 2× in case
#2 Nec Corporation and Hnsx Supercomputers, Inc. v. United States and Department of Commerce, and Cray Research, Inc. (1998) cafc 80 own cites 1× in case
#3 Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. v. The United States, and the Timken Company (1995) cafc 52 own cites 1× in case
#4 PQ Corp. v. United States (1987) cit 31 own cites 1× in case
#5 National Knitwear & Sportswear Ass'n v. United States (1991) cit 21 own cites 1× in case
#6 Hosiden Corp. v. United States (1994) cit 4 own cites 3× in case
#7 Washington Red Raspberry Commission v. United States (1987) cit 14 own cites 1× in case
#8 NEC Corp. v. U.S. Department of Commerce (1997) cit 11 own cites 1× in case
#9 Holmes Products Corp. v. United States (1992) cit 10 own cites 1× in case
#10 Comitex Knitters, Ltd. v. United States (1992) cit 7 own cites 1× in case
#11 Hosiden Corp. v. Advanced Display Manufacturers of America (1996) cafc 6 own cites 1× in case
#12 Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States (1992) cit 1 own cites 2× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.