20 C.F.R. § 10.529 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 20 C.F.R. § 10.529

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 36 citation events across 6 distinct cases.
36citations total
6distinct interpreting cases
4distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
2000–2009year range
Top 4 leading cases
#1 United States v. Webber (2008) ca7 77 own cites 14× in case
#2 United States v. Boring (2009) ca6 46 own cites 3× in case
#3 United States v. Prentice Harold Dawkins (2000) ca4 104 own cites 2× in case
#4 United States v. Harms (2006) ca5 72 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.