29 C.F.R. § 1606.8 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 29 C.F.R. § 1606.8

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 37 citation events across 18 distinct cases.
37citations total
18distinct interpreting cases
15distinct courts
20citations in last 5y
1989–2024year range
Top 11 leading cases
#1 Ali DAEMI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHURCH’S FRIED CHICKEN, INC., Defendant-Appellee (1991) ca10 104 own cites 3× in case
#2 Sims v. Montgomery County Commission (1991) almd 44 own cites 1× in case
#3 Etefia v. East Baltimore Community Corp. (1998) mdd 27 own cites 1× in case
#4 Edwards v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC (2009) almd 22 own cites 1× in case
#5 Sarin v. Raytheon Co. (1995) mad 7 own cites 2× in case
#6 Rosenbloom v. Senior Resource, Inc. (1997) mnd 6 own cites 1× in case
#7 Pakizegi v. First Nat. Bank of Boston (1993) mad 5 own cites 1× in case
#8 Vance v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1989) ca11 10 own cites 2× in case
#9 Duplessis v. Training & Development Corp. (1993) med 4 own cites 1× in case
#10 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ceisel Masonry, Inc. (2009) ilnd 2 own cites 1× in case
#11 Lopez v. UNION TANK CAR COMPANY (1998) innd 2 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.