48 C.F.R. § 33.103 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: 48 C.F.R. § 33.103

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 29 citation events across 22 distinct cases.
29citations total
22distinct interpreting cases
7distinct courts
2citations in last 5y
1987–2025year range
Top 17 leading cases
#1 Galen Medical Associates Inc. v. United States (2003) uscfc 24 own cites 3× in case
#2 Mike Hooks, Inc. v. United States (1997) uscfc 42 own cites 2× in case
#3 Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. Sheila Widnall, Secretary of the Air Force, and Contel Federal Systems, Inc., Intervenor (1994) cafc 123 own cites 1× in case
#4 DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States (2010) uscfc 24 own cites 2× in case
#5 Ulstein Maritime, Ltd. And Schottel of America, Inc. v. United States of America (1987) ca1 86 own cites 1× in case
#6 CBY Design Builders v. United States (2012) uscfc 85 own cites 1× in case
#7 ES-KO, Inc. v. United States (1999) uscfc 22 own cites 2× in case
#8 KSEND v. United States (2005) uscfc 10 own cites 3× in case
#9 Laboratory Corp. of America v. United States (2013) uscfc 37 own cites 1× in case
#10 Liff v. Office of Inspector General for U.S. Department of Labor (2018) cadc 30 own cites 1× in case
#11 McKing Consulting Corp. v. United States (2007) uscfc 27 own cites 1× in case
#12 PMTech, Inc. v. United States (2010) uscfc 16 own cites 1× in case
#13 Advanced American Construction, Inc. v. United States (2013) uscfc 15 own cites 1× in case
#14 Omega World Travel, Inc. v. United States (2008) uscfc 14 own cites 1× in case
#15 Applications Research Corp. v. Naval Air Development Center (1990) paed 10 own cites 1× in case
#16 DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States (2011) uscfc 8 own cites 1× in case
#17 FN Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States (1998) uscfc 3 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.