C.F.R. § 1607.7 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: C.F.R. § 1607.7

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 16 citation events across 13 distinct cases.
16citations total
13distinct interpreting cases
9distinct courts
0citations in last 5y
1973–2011year range
Top 13 leading cases
#1 cluster 764901 (1999) ca3 59 own cites 2× in case
#2 5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 587, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8460 United States of America v. Georgia Power Company, Charles King v. Georgia Power Company (1973) ca5 318 own cites 1× in case
#3 27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1352, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,413 Placido Rivera, Richard Gonzales, Intervenors-Appellants v. The City of Wichita Falls (1982) ca5 106 own cites 1× in case
#4 Friend v. Leidinger (1977) vaed 33 own cites 1× in case
#5 James v. STOCKHAM VALVES AND FITTINGS COMPANY (1975) alnd 9 own cites 2× in case
#6 Brunet v. City of Columbus (1986) ohsd 17 own cites 1× in case
#7 Contreras v. City of Los Angeles (1981) ca9 77 own cites 1× in case
#8 Rogers v. International Paper Co. (1975) ca8 69 own cites 1× in case
#9 Lanning v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (1999) ca3 2 own cites 2× in case
#10 cluster 393283 (1981) ca9 2 own cites 1× in case
#11 cluster 325324 (1975) ca8 1 own cites 1× in case
#12 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bashas', Inc. (2011) azd 1 own cites 1× in case
#13 United States v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the United States & Canada Local Union Number 24 (1973) njd 2 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.