C.F.R. § 9.7 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: C.F.R. § 9.7

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 99 citation events across 22 distinct cases.
99citations total
22distinct interpreting cases
12distinct courts
2citations in last 5y
1960–2024year range
Top 16 leading cases
#1 Dutcher v. Matheson (2016) ca10 57 own cites 28× in case
#2 Bell v. Countrywide Bank, N.A. (2012) utd 11 own cites 15× in case
#3 Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Sundquist (2013) utah 13 own cites 10× in case
#4 Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration (2001) cadc 255 own cites 1× in case
#5 Garrett v. ReconTrust Company, N.A. (2013) ca10 5 own cites 5× in case
#6 Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. Tandy (2009) cadc 29 own cites 1× in case
#7 Bank of Am., N.A. v. Sundquist (2018) utah 2 own cites 4× in case
#8 Martin v. Leonhart (2010) dcd 5 own cites 1× in case
#9 Parker v. Office of Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (2000) paed 4 own cites 1× in case
#10 US Ex Rel. Lamers v. City of Green Bay, Wisconsin (1996) wied 4 own cites 1× in case
#11 Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. General Motors Corp. (1984) paed 1 own cites 4× in case
#12 Drewett v. Rainier School (1991) washctapp 7 own cites 1× in case
#13 Kordus v. Biomark International LLC (2004) ded 1 own cites 1× in case
#14 Trenton Palmer v. FAA (2024) cadc 1 own cites 1× in case
#15 Porter v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (1979) txwd 1 own cites 2× in case
#16 Certified Color Industry Committee v. Secretary of Health, Education, & Welfare (1960) ca2 1 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.