Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.722 — Statute Treatment

Statute treatment: Mich. Comp. Laws § 28.722

Ranked leading cases interpreting this statute, drawn from 24 citation events across 15 distinct cases.
24citations total
15distinct interpreting cases
8distinct courts
1citations in last 5y
2001–2021year range
Top 10 leading cases
#1 Sessions v. Dimaya (2018) scotus 920 own cites 1× in case
#2 Does v. Snyder (2015) mied 20 own cites 3× in case
#3 John Does v. Richard Snyder (2016) ca6 180 own cites 1× in case
#4 Doe, SORB No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry Board (2015) mass 62 own cites 1× in case
#5 Haddad v. Fromson (2001) miwd 15 own cites 1× in case
#6 The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-Petitioner (2021) colo 10 own cites 1× in case
#7 People v. Faranso (2015) calctapp 3 own cites 1× in case
#8 United States v. Bruns (2011) cadc 3 own cites 1× in case
#9 Michael Mileski v. Eddie Washington (2012) ca6 1 own cites 3× in case
#10 Miskowski v. Martin (2003) ca6 1 own cites 1× in case

Ranking method: leading_score = ln(1 + own_citation_count) × √(mentions_in_case) × flag_factor, where flag_factor = 1.0 green · 0.6 unknown · 0.5 neutral · 0.4 yellow · 0.3 procedural · 0 red. Red-flagged cases excluded — their interpretation has been undermined and shouldn't lead the list. Top 20 returned per statute. Open any case for full G Cite, trajectory, and per-circuit treatment.