14 C.F.R. § 91.9

Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no person may operate a civil aircraft without complying with the operating limitations specified in the approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, markings, and placards, or as otherwise prescribed by the certificating authority of the country of registry.

(b) No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft—

(1) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is required by § 21.5 of this chapter unless there is available in the aircraft a current, approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual or the manual provided for in § 121.141(b); and

(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by § 21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.

(c) No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is identified in accordance with part 45 or 48of this chapter.

(d) Any person taking off or landing a helicopter certificated under part 29 of this chapter at a heliport constructed over water may make such momentary flight as is necessary for takeoff or landing through the prohibited range of the limiting height-speed envelope established for the helicopter if that flight through the prohibited range takes place over water on which a safe ditching can be accomplished and if the helicopter is amphibious or is equipped with floats or other emergency flotation gear adequate to accomplish a safe emergency ditching on open water.

[Docket 18334, 54 FR 34292, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by ; Docket FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 91-366, 87 FR 75846, Dec. 9, 2022]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 75 cases, 1970–2016 · leading case: Lowell G. Ferguson v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd. & Longhorne M. Bond, Adm'r, Fed. Aviation Admin., 678 F.2d 821 (9th Cir. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lowell G. Ferguson v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd. & Longhorne M. Bond, Adm'r, Fed. Aviation Admin., 678 F.2d 821 (9th Cir. 1982). · cites it 5× “9 ( 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 ). Jurisdiction in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is predicated upon 49 U.”

Praznik v. Sport Aero, Inc., 355 N.E.2d 686 (Ill. App. Ct. 1976). · cites it 2× “” ( 14 C.F.R. §91.9 .) Congress, by the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Public Laws 85-726, August 23, 1958 (Act), 49 U.”

Joy v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 999 F.2d 549 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “Specifically, Allison referred to 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (1987) (subsequently recodified at 14 C.”

Leon E. Barnum v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 595 F.2d 869 (D.C. Cir. 1979). · cites it 4× “3 The Administrator found that on June 1, 1975, petitioner operated a Grumman G — 73 aircraft in the vicinity of Put-in-Bay, Ohio, at altitudes substantially less than 1,000 feet above congested areas and within 500 feet of persons and structures, in violation of 14 C.F.R. §…”

Thomas E. Bowen v. United States, 570 F.2d 1311 (7th Cir. 1978). “31(a); 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.9 , 91.31(a) (1977). Indiana has, by statute, incorporated federal air safety regulations as its own standards of care.”

Barney J. Tearney v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd. & T. Allan McArtor Adm'r, Fed. Aviation Admin., 868 F.2d 1451 (Fed. Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “Tearney, a pilot for Southwest Airlines, was sanctioned for taxiing his aircraft while passengers were standing, in violation of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR), 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 . Tearney petitions for review of the National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) decision…”

Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 971 F.2d 544 (10th Cir. 1992). · cites it 3× “The Director also stated that the FAA was proceeding under 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (1989), 1 which prohibits operation of an aircraft in a careless or reckless manner, and 14 C.”

Allnutt v. United States, 498 F. Supp. 832 (W.D. Mo. 1980). · cites it 2× “First, defendant asserts that decedent violated 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 and § 91.79(c) in operating the aircraft at 100 feet over the Osage River.”

Charles Andrew Throckmorton v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., James Busey, Adm'r Fed. Aviation Admin., 963 F.2d 441 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (1986) (now 14 C.F.R. § 91.”

Murray A. Winslow v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd. Fed. Aviation Admin., 885 F.2d 615 (9th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “9, 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (1988). 1 The Administrator of the FAA found that Winslow had violated FARs 91.”

Dennis Howard v. Fed. Aviation Admin. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 17 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 1994). “14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (1987), subsequently renumbered 14 C.”

Richard Essery v. Dep't of Transp., Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd. Fed. Aviation Admin., 857 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir. 1988). “14 C.F.R. § 91.9 . In Administrator v. Reynolds, NTSB Order No.”

Show all 75 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.