17 C.F.R. § 170.8
Settlement of customer disputes (section 17(b)(10) of the Act)
A futures association must be able to demonstrate its capacity to promulgate rules and to conduct proceedings that provide a fair, equitable and expeditious procedure, through arbitration or otherwise, for the voluntary settlement of a customer's claim or grievance brought against any member of the association or any employee of a member of the association. Such rules shall conform to and be consistent with section 17(b)(10) of the Act and be consistent with the guidelines and acceptable practices for dispute resolution found within appendix A and appendix B to part 38 of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1991–2002 · leading case: John F. Belom v. National Futures Association and Joy Ju
John F. Belom v. National Futures Association and Joy Ju (2002)
“17 C.F.R. § 170.8 . Belom argues that the C.”
Reicks v. Farmers Commodities Corp. (1991)
“See 17 C.F.R. §§ 170.8 , 170.15, 180.3. The Reicks each did demand arbitration.”
Karasyk v. Marc Commodities Corp. (1991)
“5 , made applicable to the NFA through 17 C.F.R. § 170.8 . After quoting the regulation and its pertinent definitions, the Camp letter concludes: All of this is a very long way of saying that, absent the consent of both parties, NFA will not hear disputes between NFA Members,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.