17 C.F.R. § 205.1

Purpose and scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part sets forth minimum standards of professional conduct for attorneys appearing and practicing before the Commission in the representation of an issuer. These standards supplement applicable standards of any jurisdiction where an attorney is admitted or practices and are not intended to limit the ability of any jurisdiction to impose additional obligations on an attorney not inconsistent with the application of this part. Where the standards of a state or other United States jurisdiction where an attorney is admitted or practices conflict with this part, this part shall govern.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2016 · leading case: Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLC, 801 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2015).
Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLC, 801 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “” 17 C.F.R. § 205.1 . 19 protected only against retaliation for reporting to the Commission.”
Wadler v. Bio-Rad Labs., Inc., 212 F. Supp. 3d 829 (N.D. Cal. 2016). “17 C.F.R. § 205.1 (emphasis added). Second, the SEC addressed this issue in the comments that accompanied the final rule, explaining: Proposed Section 205.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.