24 C.F.R. § 1000.520
What are the purposes of HUD's review of the Annual Performance Report?
HUD will review each recipient's Annual Performance Report when submitted to determine whether the recipient:
(a) Has carried out its eligible activities in a timely manner, has carried out its eligible activities and certifications in accordance with the requirements and the primary objective of NAHASDA and with other applicable laws and has a continuing capacity to carry out those activities in a timely manner;
(b) Has complied with the IHP of the grant beneficiary; and
(c) Whether the Annual Performance Report of the recipient is accurate.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Marceau v. Blackfeet Hous. Auth., 540 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2008).
Marceau v. Blackfeet Hous. Auth., 540 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2008). “24 C.F.R. § 1000.520 . Ultimately, no statute ever required tribes to form housing authorities.”
Marceau v. Blackfeet Hous. Auth., 519 F.3d 838 (9th Cir. 2008). “24 C.F.R. § 1000.520 . Ultimately, no statute ever required tribes to form housing authorities.”
Garreaux v. United States, 544 F. Supp. 2d 885 (D.S.D. 2008). “, and 24 C.F.R. § 1000.520 . III. BIA Leasing Authority [¶ 25] In 1955, Congress passed the Indian Long-Term Leasing Act (“ITLA” or “Leasing Act”), permitting Indians to commit their lands to long-term leases, for “public, religious, educational, recreational, residential, or…”
Marceau v. Blackfeet Hous., No. 04-35210 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2008). “24 C.F.R. § 1000.520 . [12] Ultimately, no statute ever required tribes to form housing authorities.”
Marceau v. Blackfeet Hous., No. 04-35210 (9th Cir. Aug. 21, 2008). “24 C.F.R. § 1000.520 . Indian housing program.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.