C.F.R. » Title 24 » PART 17—ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS › Subpart C—Procedures for the Collection of Claims by the Government

24 C.F.R. § 17.73

Determination of the HUD Office of Hearings and Appeals

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Determination. An administrative judge of the OHA shall issue a written decision that includes the supporting rationale for the decision. The decision of the administrative judge of the OHA concerning whether a debt or part of a debt is past due and legally enforceable is the final agency decision with respect to the past due status and enforceability of the debt.

(b) Copies. Copies of the decision of the administrative judge of the OHA shall be distributed to HUD's General Counsel, HUD's Chief Financial Officer (CFO), or other appropriate HUD program official, the debtor, and the debtor's attorney or other representative, if any.

(c) Notification to the Department of the Treasury. If the decision of the administrative judge of the OHA affirms that all or part of the debt is past due and legally enforceable, HUD shall notify the Treasury after the date that the determination of the OHA has been issued under paragraph (a) of this section and a copy of the determination has been received by HUD's CFO or other appropriate HUD program official. No referral shall be made to the Treasury if the review of the debt by an administrative judge of the OHA subsequently determines that the debt is not past due or not legally enforceable.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2019 · leading case: Associated Mortg. Bankers, Inc. v. Castro (D.D.C. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Associated Mortg. Bankers, Inc. v. Castro (D.D.C. 2017). · cites it 2× “See also 24 C.F.R. § 17.73 . 11 obligation by means of administrative offset of any federal payment due Petitioner.”
Associated Mortg. Bankers, Inc. v. Castro (D.D.C. 2019). “” 24 C.F.R. § 17.73 (a). Second, there has been a change in law since AMB first litigated before the HUD AJ.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.