24 C.F.R. § 200.610

Policy

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

It is the policy of the Department to administer its FHA housing programs affirmatively, as to achieve a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market area have a like range of housing choices available to them regardless of their race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. Each applicant for participation in FHA subsidized and unsubsidized housing programs shall pursue affirmative fair housing marketing policies in soliciting buyers and tenants, in determining their eligibility, and in concluding sales and rental transactions.

[40 FR 20080, May 8, 1975, as amended at 58 FR 41337, Aug. 3, 1993]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–1997 · leading case: United States v. Inc. Vill. of Island Park, 888 F. Supp. 419 (E.D.N.Y 1995).
United States v. Inc. Vill. of Island Park, 888 F. Supp. 419 (E.D.N.Y 1995). · cites it 3× “” 24 C.F.R. § 200.610 . Applicants for HUD assistance are required to file for approval an affirmative fair housing marketing plan (AFHMP) on a form provided by HUD.”
Raso v. Lago, 958 F. Supp. 686 (D. Mass. 1997). · cites it 2× “, 24 C.F.R. § 200.610 (1996). Thus, addressing this issue was essential to securing federal funding for West End Place.”
Almonte v. Pierce, 666 F. Supp. 517 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). “HUD’s fair housing marketing policy is generally articulated in the regulations at 24 C.F.R. § 200.610 : “It is the policy of the Department to administer its FHA housing programs affirmatively, as to achieve a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same…”
Alschuler v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 515 F. Supp. 1212 (N.D. Ill. 1981). “” Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 35; See 24 C.F.R. § 200.610 (1980). The Monterey plan submitted on September 25, 1979 indicates that the developer’s rental agent would advertise the availability of rental units in media calculated to reach a broad spectrum of the Chicago area population.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.