28 C.F.R. § 2.22
Communication with the Commission
Attorneys, relatives, or interested parties wishing a personal interview to discuss a specific case with a representative of the Commission must submit a written request to the appropriate office setting forth the nature of the information to be discussed. Such interview may be conducted by a Commissioner or assigned staff, and a written summary of each such interview shall be prepared and placed in the prisoner's file.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1973–1974 · leading case: Earl Van Blaricom v. Donald Forscht, as United States Marshal, 473 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1973).
Earl Van Blaricom v. Donald Forscht, as United States Marshal, 473 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1973). “8) that “28 CFR 2.22 states that two *1328 members of the Board shall constitute a quorum * * That section, however, applies to a hearing of attorneys, relatives and other interested persons with respect to granting a parole and has no application to a revocation and termination…”
Earl Van Blaricom v. Donald Forscht, as United States Marshal, 489 F.2d 1034 (5th Cir. 1974). “(1) Appellees argue that 28 C. F.R. § 2.22 which provides for a quorum of two members of the Parole Board in hearings on granting parole, coupled with the succeeding section, § 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.