28 C.F.R. § 39.101
Purpose
This part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the U.S. Postal Service.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2021 · leading case: Ability Ctr. of Greater Toledo v. City of Sandusky, 385 F.3d 901 (6th Cir. 2004).
Ability Ctr. of Greater Toledo v. City of Sandusky, 385 F.3d 901 (6th Cir. 2004). “For instance, Title II states that, with respect to regulations that affect program accessibility and existing facilities, “such regulations shall be consistent with regulations and analysis as in [ 28 C.F.R. § 39.101 et seq.], applicable to federally conducted activities under…”
Cooke v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 926 F. Supp. 2d 720 (E.D.N.C. 2013). “However, in the Department of Justice’s regulations concerning the Administrative Remedy Program, the Department of Justice defines “inmate” more broadly than the term "prisoner” is defined in the PLRA.”
Kendall v. Murray, 340 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.D.C. 2018). “" The regulations are published at 28 C.F.R. §§ 39.101 -.170 (2012). Cooke v.”
In Re: Amendments to Rules 250-252 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Jud. Admin. & Adoption of Rules 260-263 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Jud. Admin. (Pa. 2021). “and 28 C.F.R. §§ 39.101 et seq., implementing these laws.”
Beddow v. Rhodes (D. Kan. 2020). “36See 28 C.F.R. § 39.101 (stating that “[t]his part effectuates section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.