(a) If your CSO has reason to believe that you are failing to abide by the general or specific conditions of release or you are engaging in criminal activity, you will be in violation of the conditions of your supervision. Your CSO may then impose administrative sanctions (see paragraph (b) of this section) and/or request a hearing by the releasing authority. This hearing may result in the revocation of your release or changes to the conditions of your release.
(b) Administrative sanctions available to the CSO include:
(1) Daily check-in with supervision for a specified period of time;
(2) Increased group activities for a specified period of time;
(3) Increased drug testing;
(4) Increased supervision contact requirements;
(5) Referral for substance abuse addiction or other specialized assessments;
(6) Electronic monitoring for a specified period of time;
(7) Community service for a specified number of hours;
(8) Placement in a residential sanctions facility or residential treatment facility for a specified period of time.
(9) Travel restrictions.
(c) You remain subject to further action by the releasing authority. For example, the USPC may override the imposition of any of the sanctions in paragraph (b) of this section and issue a warrant or summons if you are a parolee and it finds that you are a risk to the public safety or that you are not complying in good faith with the sanctions (see 28 CFR 2.85(a)(15)).
Notes of Decisions
Jeffrey H. Hunt v. United States, 109 A.3d 620 (D.C. 2014).
· cites it 4× “28 C.F.R. § 810.3 (a) (2014). “Administrative sanctions available to the CSO” include daily check-ins, community service, increased group activities, increased drug testing, drug abuse assessments, residential treatment placement, travel restrictions, and “[electronic monitoring…”
Davis v. United States (D.C. 2023).
· cites it 14× “uthority, the procedural protections the Parole Commission otherwise affords against warrantless searches of people on supervised release, and our evolved understanding that electronic monitoring constitutes a search deserving of Fourth Amendment protection, we conclude that…”
United States v. Wells (D.C. 2025).
· cites it 2× “See 28 C.F.R. § 810.3 (b)(6) (authorizing sanctions of “[e]lectronic monitoring for a specified period of time”).”
United States v. White (D.D.C. 2026).
“Page 26 of 51 requiring CSOSA supervisees to “comply with the sanction(s) imposed by the supervision officer and as established by an approved schedule of graduated sanctions”); 28 C.F.R. § 810.3 (2023) (CSOSA regulation allowing CSOs to impose “electronic monitoring for a…”
— 28 C.F.R. § 810.3(c) — 1 case
Jeffrey H. Hunt v. United States, 109 A.3d 620 (D.C. 2014).
“28 C.F.R. § 810.3 (a) (2014). “Administrative sanctions available to the CSO” include daily check-ins, community service, increased group activities, increased drug testing, drug abuse assessments, residential treatment placement, travel restrictions, and “[electronic monitoring…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.