29 C.F.R. § 1903.21

State administration

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this part 1903 shall preempt the authority of any State to conduct inspections, to initiate enforcement proceedings or otherwise to implement the applicable provisions of State law with respect to State occupational safety and health standards in accordance with agreements and plans under section 18 of the Act and parts 1901 and 1902 of this chapter.

[36 FR 17850, Sept. 4, 1971. Redesignated at 62 FR 15337, Mar. 31, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1980–1996 · leading case: Capital City Excavating Co., Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor, & Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 679 F.2d 105 (6th Cir. 1982).
Capital City Excavating Co., Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of Labor, & Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 679 F.2d 105 (6th Cir. 1982). “29 C.F.R. § 1903.21 (c). October 6 was the fifteenth working day after September 15.”
Irving v. United States, 942 F. Supp. 1483 (D.N.H. 1996). “There is no evidence that Area Director Amirault so delegated his responsibilities in this case.”
Martin v. Gard, 811 F. Supp. 616 (D. Kan. 1993). “Third, the definition of CSHO, 29 C.F.R. § 1903.21 (d), seems broad enough to encompass a solicitor.”
Marshall v. Milwaukee Boiler Mfg. Co., 626 F.2d 1339 (7th Cir. 1980). “In any event, “Area Director” is defined in 29 C.F.R. § 1903.21 (e) as including “the employer or officer regularly or temporarily in charge of an area office .”
Irving v. USA (D.N.H. 1996). “) While 10 Under 29 C.F.R. § 1903.21 (e), the Area Director may delegate to a compliance officer his or her responsibility to review inspection reports and issue citations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.