C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XVII—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 1952—APPROVED STATE PLANS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF STATE STANDARDS › Subpart A—List of Approved State Plans for Private-Sector and State and Local Government Employees

29 C.F.R. § 1952.2

Oregon

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Oregon State plan received initial approval on December 28, 1972.

(b) The Oregon State plan received final approval on May 12, 2005.

(c) Under the terms of the 1978 Court Order in AFL-CIO v. Marshall, compliance staffing levels (“benchmarks”) necessary for a “fully effective” enforcement program were required for each State operating an approved State plan. In October 1992, Oregon completed, in conjunction with OSHA, a reassessment of the health staffing level initially established in 1980 and proposed a revised health benchmark of 28 health compliance officers. Oregon elected to retain the safety benchmark level established in the 1980 Report to the Court of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 1980 of 47 safety compliance officers. After opportunity for public comment and service on the AFL-CIO, the Assistant Secretary approved these revised staffing requirements on August 11, 1994.

(d) The plan covers all private-sector employers and employees, with several notable exceptions, as well as State and local government employers and employees, within the State. For current information on these exceptions and for additional details about the plan, please visit http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/oregon.html.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: OR-OSHA v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 494 P.3d 959 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
OR-OSHA v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 494 P.3d 959 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “To that end, the direc- tor is vested with broad general rulemaking authority,12 as well as specific authority “by general or special orders, or by regulations, rules, codes or otherwise” to, among other 10 Oregon received initial approval of its plan in 1972 and final approval…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.