29 C.F.R. § 452.1

Introductory statement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This part discusses the meaning and scope of the provisions of title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), which deal with the election of officers of labor organizations. These provisions require periodic election of union officers, and prescribe minimum standards to insure that such elections will be fairly conducted. Specific provisions are included to assure the right of union members to participate in selecting their officers without fear of interference or reprisal, and to protect the right to nominate candidates, run for office, and vote in officer elections. Title IV also sets forth the rights of candidates, provides for secret ballots in appropriate cases, and requires notice of nominations and elections, preservation of election records, and other safeguards to insure fair elections. However, the Act does not prescribe complete, detailed procedures for the nomination and election of union officers.

1 73 Stat. 532-535, 29 U.S.C. 481-483.

(b) Interpretations of the Director with respect to the election provisions of title IV are set forth in this part to provide those affected by these provisions of the Act with “a practical guide * * * as to how the office representing the public interest in its enforcement will seek to apply it.” 2 The correctness of an interpretation can be determined finally and authoritatively only by the courts. It is necessary, however, for the Director to reach informed conclusions as to the meaning of the law to enable him to carry out his statutory duties of administration and enforcement. The interpretations of the Director contained in this part, which are issued upon the advice of the Solicitor of Labor, indicate the construction of the law which will guide him in performing his duties unless and until he is directed otherwise by authoritative rulings of the courts or unless and until he subsequently announces that a prior interpretation is incorrect. However, the fact that a particular problem is not discussed in this part, or in interpretations supplementing it, should not be taken to indicate the adoption of any position by the Director with respect to such problem or to constitute an administrative interpretation or practice.

2Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 at 138 (1944).

(c) To the extent that prior opinions and interpretations relating to the election of officers of labor organizations under the Act are inconsistent or in conflict with the principles stated in this part, they are hereby rescinded and withdrawn.

[38 FR 18324, July 9, 1973, as amended at 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen & Packers v. Crowley, 467 U.S. 526 (1984). · cites it 2× “[14] The Secretary of Labor, who has primary responsibility for the enforcement of Title IV, has summarized the requirements of that Title in 29 CFR § 452.1 (1983). See generally 29 CFR pt.”
Ble Int'l Reform Comm., Sec'y of Labor, Intervenor v. John F. Sytsma, 802 F.2d 180 (6th Cir. 1986). “In so concluding, the district court quoted from 29 C.F.R. § 452.1 (b), one of the Secretary’s regulations which states in part that ”[t]he correctness of an interpretation can be determined finally and authoritatively only by the courts.”
Dean v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 476, 549 F. Supp. 2d 115 (D.D.C. 2008). “§ 481 ; 29 C.F.R. § 452.1 ; id. at § 452.76). In light of these regulations, the Court found that Mr.”
Dean v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 476, 509 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2007). “§ 481 ; 29 C.F.R. § 452.1 . Specifically, 29 C.F.”
Reich v. Local 30, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, 6 F.3d 978 (3rd Cir. 1993). “interpreting Title IV in 29 C.F.R. § 452.1 et seq. (1992). 29 C.F.”
Chao v. Local 538 of the United Food & Com. Workers Int'l Union, 307 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (W.D. Wis. 2004). · cites it 2× “The interpretations of the Assistant Secretary contained in this part, which are issued upon the advice of the Solicitor of Labor, indicate the construction of the law which will guide him in performing his duties unless and until he is directed otherwise by authoritative…”
Marshall v. Local Lodge, 1784, Int'l Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 509 F. Supp. 90 (D. Maryland 1981). “(Affidavit of Lawton Ewing, Paper No. 38, at ¶¶ 4 & 5). In accordance with its statutory duty to administer Title IV of the LMRDA, §§ 401, 402, 29 U.”
Small v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 626 F. Supp. 96 (S.D. Ohio 1985). “2 (1985), as well as election requirements, 29 C.F.R. §§ 452.1 -.138 (1985). The defendant has argued persuasively that since § 402 applies equally to election complaints and the removal of officers, the election cases interpreting § 402 are in *101 structive in analyzing the…”
BLE Int'l Reform Comm. v. Sytsma, 636 F. Supp. 521 (N.D. Ohio 1985). “with respect to the election provisions of Title IV are set forth in this part to provide those affected by these provisions of the Act with “a practical guide * * * as to how the office representing the public interest in its enforcement will seek to apply it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.