29 C.F.R. § 541.705
Trainees
The executive, administrative, professional, outside sales and computer employee exemptions do not apply to employees training for employment in an executive, administrative, professional, outside sales or computer employee capacity who are not actually performing the duties of an executive, administrative, professional, outside sales or computer employee.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: Gallegos v. Equity Title Co. of Am., Inc., 484 F. Supp. 2d 589 (W.D. Tex. 2007).
Gallegos v. Equity Title Co. of Am., Inc., 484 F. Supp. 2d 589 (W.D. Tex. 2007). “29 C.F.R. Section 541.705(b). It includes a wide variety of persons who carry out major assignments in conducting the operations of the business.”
Harris v. Vector Mktg. Corp., 656 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (N.D. Cal. 2009). “” 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 . There is no evidence in the record indicating that, during the three-day training program, Ms.”
Ferrara v. 4JLJ, LLC, 150 F. Supp. 3d 813 (S.D. Tex. 2016). “Probationary Period Ferrara first claims that, for the initial 90 days of his employment, he was on probation and was merely a “trainee” and non-exempt as set out in' 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 . The FLSA training exception to exemption status reads: The executive, administrative,…”
Hendricks v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC (S.D. Ohio 2023). “However, Plaintiffs take the position that the Court need not even engage in an analysis of the administrative exemption for LAETs because under 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 , the administrative exemption does not apply to employees training for employment in an administrative capacity.”
Levine v. Vitamin Cottage Nat. Food Markets, Inc. (D. Colo. 2023). “According to 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 : “The executive [and] administrative .”
Kushelowitz v. Teva Pharm., USA, Inc. (D.N.J. 2023). “) On January 26, 2023, Defendants answered the Complaint, asserting among other affirmative defenses that “[t]he NYLL does not contain any provision or regulation addressing outside salespersons in training, nor has the NYLL expressly adopted 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 ,” and that…”
Conklin v. The United States Postal Serv. (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “Third, and relatedly, 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 explicitly states: The executive, administrative, professional, outside sales and computer employee exemptions do not apply to employees training for employment in an executive, administrative, professional, outside sales or computer…”
Hendricks v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC (S.D. Ohio 2023). “The fact that certain elements of proof may favor the defendant For that same reason, the Court declines to address an argument presented by Plaintiffs: that the administrative exemption does not apply to the LAETs because under 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 , the administrative exemption…”
Hobbs v. EVO Inc. (S.D. Tex. 2019). “” 29 C.F.R. § 541.705 . Based on the testimony and evidence adduced at trial, the Court makes the following findings of fact: 1.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 541.705(b) — 1 case
Gallegos v. Equity Title Co. of Am., Inc., 484 F. Supp. 2d 589 (W.D. Tex. 2007). “29 C.F.R. Section 541.705(b). It includes a wide variety of persons who carry out major assignments in conducting the operations of the business.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 541.705(c) — 1 case
Gallegos v. Equity Title Co. of Am., Inc., 484 F. Supp. 2d 589 (W.D. Tex. 2007). “29 C.F.R. Section 541.705(b). It includes a wide variety of persons who carry out major assignments in conducting the operations of the business.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.