C.F.R.
»
Title 29
» CHAPTER V—WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER B—STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY OR INTERPRETATION NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO REGULATIONS › PART 779—THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT AS APPLIED TO RETAILERS OF GOODS OR SERVICES › Subpart A—General
In the 1949 amendments to the Act, the term “retail or service establishment”, which was not previously defined in the law, was given a special definition for purposes of the Act. The legislative history of the 1961 and the 1966 amendments to the Act, which use the same term in a number of provisions relating to coverage and exemptions, indicates that no different meaning was intended by the term “retail or service establishment” as used in the new provisions from that already established by the Act's definition. On the contrary, the existing definition was reenacted in section 13(a)(2) of the Act as amended in 1961 and 1966 as follows: “A ‘retail or service establishment’ shall mean an establishment 75 per centum of whose annual dollar volume of sales of goods or services (or of both) is not for resale and is recognized as retail sales or services in the particular industry”. The application of this definition, which has had much judicial construction since its original enactment, is considered at length in subpart D of this part. As is apparent from the quoted language, not every establishment which engages in retail selling of goods or services will constitute a “retail or service establishment” within the meaning of the Act.
Notes of Decisions
Alvarado v. Corporate Cleaning Service, Inc. (2010)
ilnd · cites it 2×
“; see also 29 C.F.R. § 779.24 . The Department of Labor (“DOL”) promulgated regulations interpreting the term "retail or service establishment” based on the definition in § 213(a)(2).”
Liger v. NEW ORLEANS HORNETS NBA LTD. PARTNERSHIP (2008)
laed
“” 29 C.F.R. § 779.24 . The Department of Labor regulations provide excellent guidance for determining whether a particular employer may claim the “retail or service establishment” exemption.”
Burden v. Selectquote Insurance Services (2012)
cand
“See 29 C.F.R. §§ 779.24 , 779.312, 779.411. 7 The DOL’s interpretive regulations identify three characteristics of a retail or service establishment: (1) it typically “sells goods or services to the general public,” (2) “serves the everyday needs of the community in which it is…”
Noe v. Smart Mortgage Centers, Inc. (2024)
ilnd · cites it 2×
“2006) (citing 29 C.F.R. § 779.24 ). But Congress later repealed 17 § 213(a)(2), which exempted intrastate businesses from the overtime and minimum wage requirements under the FLSA.”
Jackson v. R & A Towing, LLC (2023)
txsd
“; see also 29 C.F.R. § 779.24 . Determining whether a business fits the retail concept can be difficult because “a precise line cannot be drawn and exact objective standards cannot be established.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.